-
OJ 14/23, [7] Handwritten letter from Seligmann to Schenker, undated [probably late summer or
early autumn 1903]
In this long letter, Seligmann advises Schenker on how to prepare an
application for a teaching post at the Vienna Conservatory: what to include and whom to get
in touch with at the Conservatory and the Gesellschaft der Muikfreunde. He thinks that a
position at the projected Lyceum in Vienna offers a better prospect and advises enlisting
the help of his patron Baron Rothschild.
-
Sbb B II 4424 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Busoni, dated October 8, 1903
The orchestral parts of Schoenberg's orchestration of Schenker's Syrische
Tänze have been dispatched to Busoni: Schenker comments on their degree of clarity and
correctness, and offers advice on performance. He will be attending rehearsals in Berlin.
Weinberger have asked that the existing title be retained. -- Schenker reports on
prospective performances of his works. He also reports on good chances of receiving a theory
professorship at the Vienna Conservatory, and doesn't want Jewishness associated with his
compositions lest this should impair those chances.
-
BNba Frimmel Nachl, [1] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Frimmel, dated March 13, 1905
Schenker sends a copy of his Handel Organ Concertos as a memento of past
music-making with Frimmel, and tells him of his work on his Harmonielehre.
-
OJ 9/6, [39] Handwritten postcard from Eugen d'Albert to Schenker, dated May 25, 1905
Eugen d'Albert acknowledges receipt of a package from Schenker and indicates
that he will remain in Italy until the Fall.
-
CA 1-2 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated November 8, 1905
This is Schenker's initial approach to Cotta: he asks the firm to consider
publishing volume I of his Neue Musikalische Theorien und Phantasien, explains his
anonymity, points out the book's attacks of certain composers, explains his choice of
preferred publisher.
-
OJ 9/6, [44] Handwritten letter from Eugen d'Albert to Schenker, dated November 8,
1905
In this significant letter, Eugen d'Albert agrees [to help Schenker find
a publisher for his Harmonielehre] and has already written to Brockhaus. He seeks to
interest Schenker in his new opera "Flauto Solo," the première of which, in Prague,
is in four days' time.
-
OJ 9/31, [2] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Eugen d’Albert, dated November 14,
1905
Following Eugen d'Albert's intervention on Schenker's behalf, Cotta is asking
to see the manuscript of Harmonielehre.
-
OJ 9/31, [3] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated November 15,
1905
Cotta will consider Schenker's proposal further, and asks for sight of the
manuscript.
-
OJ 9/6, [45a] Handwritten letter from Eugen d’Albert to Schenker, undated [c. November 18,
1905]
Having recommended Schenker's Harmonielehre to J. G. Cotta, publisher,
Eugen d'Albert hands the matter over to Schenker. He proposes a meeting after his
recital on November 23, and thanks Schenker for attending the première of his opera
"Flauto solo" in Prague.
-
OJ 9/31, [4] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated December 5,
1905
Cotta agrees to publish Harmonielehre. — It estimates the extent of the book,
the cost to Schenker, and his likely takings.
-
CA [205] Typewritten extracts from contract between Cotta and Schenker, dated December 5,
1905
Excerpts from the contract between Cotta and Schenker for
Harmonielehre
-
CA 9 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated December 10, 1905
Schenker returns his contract signed, and promises the Afterword
soon.
-
OJ 9/31, [6] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated January 27,
1906
Cotta sends a list of music examples that are missing from Schenker's
material.
-
OJ 9/31, [7] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated February 7,
1906
Cotta will in future send galley-proofs.
-
OJ 9/31, [8] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated May 31,
1906
Cotta advises against splitting Harmonielehre into two volumes, and recommends
restriction of the size of the Nachwort.
-
CA 27 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated June 4, 1906
Schenker accepts Cotta's advice to keep Harmonielehre as one volume. — He will publish
the Nachwort separately. — He pleads for proofs of Part II of Harmonielehre before the
summer vacation.
-
OJ 9/31, [9] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated June 5,
1906
Cotta advises against publishing the Nachwort simultaneously with the
Harmoneilehre.
-
OJ 9/31, [10] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated June 27,
1906
Cotta asks for return of proofs as soon as possible; setting of music examples
is delayed.
-
CA 31 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated June 30, 1906
Schenker returns proofs, and draws two things to the attention of the
type-setter.
-
OJ 9/31, [11] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated August 30,
1906
Cotta promises further proofs of Harmonielehre, and asks Schenker not to makes
large additions.
-
OJ 15/8, [4] Typewritten letter from Waldheim–Eberle to Schenker, dated September 17,
1906
Josef Stritzko is disappointed that Schenker has gone back on his consent for
the terms offered by Doblinger for publication of the Instrumentations-Tabelle: Schenker
will not find better terms elsewhere.
-
OJ 9/31, [12] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated September 24,
1906
Cotta urges swift return of proofs, stresses the need to publish before
Christmas, and requests copy of the title-page.
-
CA 41-42 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated October 1, 1906
Schenker goes back on his earlier agreement with Cotta, and makes an
impassioned case for including the "Nachwort" as Section 3 of Part II of
Harmonielehre.
-
OJ 9/31, [13] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated October 2,
1906
Cotta gives pressing reasons why Harmonielehre must be published by
November.
-
CA 44 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated October 6, 1906
Schenker accepts Cotta's case that his "Nachwort" should not be included
within Harmonielehre, promises to enable the book to be published on time, and plans to have
the "Nachwort" follow by the time of the Easter book fair.
-
OJ 9/31, [14] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated October 8,
1906
Cotta expresses satisfaction that Schenker has decided to separate the
"Nachwort" from publication of Harmonielehre.
-
CA 56 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated November 22, 1906
Cotta should by now have received the sum covering the publishing and
marketing costs of Harmonielehre. Schenker lists five recipients of review
copies.
-
CA 57 Telegram from Alphons von Rothschild to Cotta, dated November 23, 1906
Rothschild has sent 4300.30 Marks.
-
CA 58 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated November 24, 1906
Schenker lists the journals for which the five music critics (as listed in CA
56) to receive review copies write.
-
OJ 15/6, [6] Handwritten letter from Fritz Wahle to Schenker, undated [November ?27–28,
?1906]
In a letter written in the course of two evenings, Fritz Wahle thanks Schenker
for sending him a copy of his latest book (probably Harmonielehre), which he wants to be
among the first to read. He congratulates Schenker for having maintained such high goals in
the writing of the work, which only Philistines would misunderstand, or seek to
misrepresent. The letter includes an attempt to compare a servant who doesn’t know how to
wear his master’s clothes to a philistine critic who has no concept of the value of a
serious act of creation.
-
OJ 9/6, [46] Handwritten letter from Eugen d'Albert to Schenker, dated December 15,
1906
Eugen d'Albert asks Schenker to put the word out to the Viennese press
that he was deliberately kept in the dark over the première of his opera "Flauto
Solo" at the Vienna Court Opera and feels much aggrieved. Lothar has not contacted
him.
-
CA 61 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated December 27, 1906
Schenker asks for a copy to be sent to Eugen d'Albert.
-
OJ 12/27, [3] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated December 29,
1906
Cotta has sent a complimentary copy of Harmonielehre to Eugen
d'Albert.
-
OJ 12/27, [4] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated January 7,
1907
Cotta inquires whether Schenker's name may be divulged.
-
CA 64 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated January 8, 1907
Schenker replies that anonymity re Harmonielehre must be
maintained.
-
OJ 9/2, [2] Invoice from Cotta to Schenker, dated March 9 1907
Invoice from Cotta for copy of Harmonielehre sent to Karl
Goldmark.
-
CA 66 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated March 30, 1907
Schenker asks for a review copy of Harmonielehre to be sent to Max
Graf.
-
CA 67 Stenographically handwritten letter (carbon copy) from Cotta to Schenker, dated
April 2, 1907
Cotta report that they sent a copy for review to the Österreichische Rundschau
in February.
-
OJ 9/32, [3] Invoice from Cotta to Schenker, dated August 1907
Invoice from Cotta for copy of Harmonielehre.
-
OJ 12/27, [5] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated September 5,
1907
Cotta encloses 1906 sales report for Harmonielehre.
-
CA 68 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated September 13, 1907
Schenker expects the press to be enthusiastic about Harmonielehre. — He
comments of the "Riemann school."
-
OJ 9/31, [16] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated September 16,
1907
Cotta hopes for the manuscript of Kontrapunkt [I] soon, and asserts that the
same terms of contract will apply as those for Harmonielehre.
-
OJ 12/27, [10] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated December 12,
1907
Cotta enclose a letter from Karl Grunsky and inquire whether they may disclose
Schenker's name to him as the author of Harmonielehre.
-
CA 71 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated December 16, 1907
Schenker proscribes the release yet of his name to Karl Grunsky. He comments
on a review of his Harmonielehre by Max Burkhardt. He will be sending Kontrapunkt
shortly.
-
OJ 9/31, [17] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated December 18,
1907
Cotta note the review of Harmonielehre by Max Burkhart, and look forward to
receiving the manuscript of Kontrapunkt shortly.
-
OJ 5/15, [1] Incomplete handwritten draft letter from Schenker to Grunsky, dated January 21,
1908
Schenker has not responded to Grunsky's invitation because of pressure of work
with Kontrapunkt. — He thanks Grunsky for his review of Harmonielehre; justifies favoring
the piano repertory there; remarks on Strauss and Reger with respect to "good" and "bad." —
He refers to his Formenlehre as vol. III of his Neue musikalische Theorien und
Phantasien.
-
OJ 5/35, [1] Handwritten draft letter from Schenker to Ernst Rudorff, dated January 21,
1908
Schenker makes a first approach to Rudorff; it concerns interpretation of a
passage in Chopin's Ballade No. 2, Op. 38; — He asserts his belief in consulting -- and
teaching students to consult -- only original sources, and in the Urtext
principle.
-
CA 75 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated February 8, 1908
Schenker asks for a copy of his Harmonielehre to be sent to Theodor
Frimmel.
-
OJ 11/10, [12] Handwritten picture postcard from Frimmel to Schenker, dated February 20,
1908
Frimmel thanks Schenker for his complimentary copy of the latter's
Harmonielehre.
-
CA 76 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated April 24, 1908
Schenker asks for a copy of his Harmonielehre to be sent to the Gesellschaft
der Musikfreunde; — He seeks advice regarding Theodor Frimmel and the Beethoven-Jahrbuch,
explaining the delay on Kontrapunkt I.
-
OJ 9/31, [18] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated April 25,
1908
Cotta has sent a copy of Harmonielehre to the Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde,
and thinks that pre-publication excerpting of Kontrapunkt would be
advantageous.
-
OJ 11/29, [1] Handwritten letter from Grunsky to Schenker, dated May 3, 1908
Grunsky thanks Schenker for revealing his identity as author of Harmonielehre.
— He asks Schenker's views on Bruckner, and on his own views of musical
form.
-
OJ 5/15, [2]-[3] Handwritten incomplete draft of a letter from Schenker to Grunsky, undated [?c. June
1, 1908]
Responding to Grunsky's request, Schenker gives his assessment of Bruckner's
music. First exploring common ground between him and Grunsky, he then offers "technical
reasons" why he regards Bruckner as "possessing minimal powers of invention," therefore
cannot call him a "master." In the process, he compares the "Komponisten" (composers) of the
present day unfavorably with the "Tonsetzer" (tonal craftsmen) of the past.
-
OJ 9/31, [19] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated June 2,
1908
Cotta asks if they may divulge Schenker's name to Rudolf
Breithausen.
-
WSLB 9 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 23, 1908
Schenker promises a list of people in German to receive complimentary copies of
Ornamentik, and a new proposal.
-
OJ 9/32, [4] Invoice from Cotta to Schenker, dated September 1, 1908
Invoice for copies of Harmonielehre to Busoni, the Gesellschaft der
Musikfreunde, and Löwe.
-
OJ 9/32, [12] Sales Report from Cotta ro Schenker, undated [September 8[?], 1908]
1908 sales report for Harmonielehre
-
OJ 9/32, [25] Sales Report from Cotta, dated September 9, 1907
1907 sales report for Harmonielehre
-
OJ 5/35, [2] Handwritten draft or letter-copy from Schenker to Ernst Rudorff, undated [September
17, 1908]
Schenker is pleased at Rudorff's agreement with his ideas in the Beitrag zur
Ornamentik, and speaks of his difficulties with the Viennese music profession. — He takes
leave to have a copy of his Harmonielehre dispatched to Rudorff.
-
CA 80 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated September 13 and 17,
1908
Schenker promises Counterpoint soon and speculates on publication by
Christmas; — Asks for a copy of Harmonielehre to be sent to his sister
Sophie.
-
OJ 12/27, [7] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated September 18,
1908
Cotta looks forward to receiving Kontrapunkt, and has sent copies of
Harmonielehre to Sophie Guttmann and Ernst Rudorff.
-
OJ 5/15, [6] Fragmentary handwritten draft letter from Schenker to Grunsky, undated [? mid‒late
September 1908?]
Discusses Bruckner's compositional technique, content, and "eccentric" form:
highly fragmentary document.
-
OJ 13/37, 3 Stenographically handwritten letter from Ernst Rudorff to Schenker, dated September
24, 1908
Grunsky thanks Schenker for the copy of his Harmonielehre and praises it; in
particular he approves of its attacks on Wagner, whom he speaks of as a malign
force.
-
CA 84 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated September 27, 1908
Schenker promises the remainder of Kontrapunkt in a few days.
-
OJ 5/15, [4] Incomplete handwritten letter draft from Schenker to Grunsky, undated [?between
September 23 and December 31, 1908]
Schenker reports progress on his Kontrapunkt. — The main problem in music is
"how length can be produced." — He recollects his love for the pious Bruckner, and his
admiration for the latter's music, but speaks of its "defects," comparing the music
favorably with that of Tchaikovsky. Bruckner's stumbling block was form.
-
CA 85 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated October 8, 1908
Schenker proposed that Kontrapunkt be divided into two
half-volumes.
-
OJ 5/6, [2] Draft of handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, undated [October 12?,
1908]
Schenker accepts Cotta's verdict against splitting Kontrapunkt into
two.
-
CA 87 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated October 13, 1908
Schenker accepts Cotta's verdict against splitting Kontrapunkt into
two.
-
OJ 9/31, [20] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated October 15,
1908
Cotta states that Kontrapunkt will be produced under the terms of the contract
for Harmonielehre.
-
OJ 13/37, 5 Handwritten letter from Ernst Rudorff to Schenker, dated November 21,
1908
Rudorff's poor health is restricting his activities. — He praises Schenker's
Harmonielehre, especially its views on the church modes. — He also endorses Schenker's
condemnation of Wagner's musical influence.
-
CA 92 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated January 4, 1909
Schenker directs Cotta to divulge his name on the title-page of the 2nd edn of
Harmonielehre; — He has meanwhile added a long polemic to the Introduction of Kontrapunkt
[I].
-
OJ 9/31, [22] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated January 14,
1909
Cotta agrees to reset the title-page of Harmonielehre with Schenker's name as
author, and to distribute the second edition coincident with the release of Kontrapunkt
I.
-
BNba Frimmel Nachl, [3] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Frimmel, dated April 8, 1909
Schenker thanks Frimmel for his copy of Beethoven-Jahrbuch vol. II, and
expresses admiration at Frimmel's editing of the authors' contributions, remarking how
slowly he is proceeding with his own Kontrapunkt. He comments on two of the
contributions.
-
CA 96-98 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated May 26, 1909
Schenker raises again the splitting of Kontrapunkt into two half-volumes, or
even four installments. — He reports that his Beitrag zur Ornamentik has been adopted by the
Academy of Music, despite his being in a constant state of feud with all officialdom. — The
Academy's Director is a supporter of his theory. — Schenker outlines how earlier works of
his have become influential. — His Kontrapunkt is "eagerly awaited" and will be the "leading
work" on the subject; he argues the case for splitting the work on "psychological" and
"technical" grounds.
-
WSLB-Hds 94475 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Seligmann, undated [probably early July
1909]
Schenker asks Seligmann to read an essay on Byron’s Manfred and, if he thinks
it worthy of publication, to send a letter of reference to one or other Viennese newspaper.
He also expresses his satisfaction at how his career is shaping: he has requested and
received generous fees for the editions he has prepared for Universal Edition, and his
theoretical writings for Cotta are also moving along.
-
OJ 9/32, [5] Invoice from Cotta to Schenker, dated September 1, 1909
Invoice for copies of Harmonielehre to Sofie Guttmann and Ernst
Rudorff.
-
OJ 5/35, [5] Handwritten draft letter from Schenker to Ernst Rudorff, dated October 10,
1909
Schenker, on receipt of the score of a Rudorff choral work, praises its
textural clarity and melodic articulation, comparing them favorably to the writing of the
current generation. — He reports the success of his own recent theory works, and inroads
made into the Vienna Academy for Music and Performance Art.
-
OJ 13/37, 8 Handwritten letter from Ernst Rudorff to Schenker, dated November 14,
1909
Rudorff apologizes for his publisher's treating Schenker as a conductor; —
laments that Germany's conductors ignore his music; — asks for help in a matter concerning
an overture of his.
-
CA 106-107 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated December 2, 1909
Schenker explains the necessity for some late interpolations into Kontrapunkt
I. — He may be able to include the title "Professor of Composition and Theory" against his
name on the title-pages of his works, and debates the advantages of such an appointment at
the Vienna Academy against the loss of independence. — Only anonymity has prevented
Harmonielehre from success so far.
-
OJ 13/37, 10 Handwritten letter from Ernst Rudorff to Schenker, dated December 17,
1909
Rudorff reports on situation with his "Eckbert" Overture, and comments
adversely on publishers.
-
CA 111 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated May 1, 1910
Schenker asks urgently for remaining galley-proofs of Counterpoint
1.
-
CA 112 Carbon copy of stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated June
16, 1910
Cotta asks Schenker for manuscript of the prelims and any supplements for
Kontrapunkt I, and for a publicity blurb.
-
CA 117 Handwritten letter and publicity material from Schenker to Cotta, dated July 17,
1910
Covering letter with draft publicity material for Kontrapunkt 1. Schenker
promises to return proof of Preface.
-
OJ 9/32, [13] Handwritten letter and sales report for 1909 for Harmonielehre from Cotta, dated
September 6, 1910
1909 sales report for Harmonielehre, with covering letter
-
CA 121-122 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated September 10, 1910
Schenker explains the basis for his "Handbibliothek," suggests an overarching
title and a separate title for the proposed first booklet, on Beethoven's Ninth Symphony. He
promises to return the manuscript of vol. II/1.
-
CA 127 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated September 20, 1910
Schenker asks for a copy of Kontrapunkt 1 to be sent to Ernst Rudorff and
copies of that and Harmonielehre to be sent to Jenny Kornfeld at her Aussig
address.
-
CA 128 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated September 29, 1910
Schenker asks for a review copy of Kontrapunkt 1 to be sent to Ludwig
Karpath.
-
CA 129 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated October 3, 1910
Schenker redirects the copies of Harmonielehre and Kontrapunkt I destined for
Jenny Kornfeld to his own address in Vienna.
-
OJ 9/31, [27] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated October 4,
1910
Publication of Kontrapunkt 1 having taken place this day, Cotta confirms the
orders of complimentary and review copies to Jenny Kornfeld, Ernst Rudorff, Ludwig Karpath,
and Schenker himself.
-
CA 134-135 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated October 21, 1910
Schenker divulges the identity of his benefactor, explains why there has been
a delay in payment by the Rothschild Bank, and promises payment by sometime in
January.
-
CA 139 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated October 25, 1910
Schenker asks for a copy of his Harmonielehre to be sent to Prof. Robert Fuchs
at the Vienna Academy.
-
OJ 12/27, [14] Stenographically handwritten postcard from Cotta to Schenker, dated October 27,
1910
Cotta has sent a complimentary copy of Harmonielehre to Robert
Fuchs.
-
OJ 5/34, [1] Handwritten draft letter from Schenker to Alphons Rothschild, incompletely dated
[March 2, 1911]
Highly rhetorical letter in which Schenker thanks Alphons Rothschild for the
financial support for his first two volumes, and notifies him of the forthcoming monograph
on Beethoven's Ninth Symphony.
-
WSLB 113 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated May 18, 1912
Schenker asks to see the entire volume of his monograph on Beethoven's Ninth
Symphony again for a final check, and urges that the work be published in time for the
Vienna Music Festival Week, and that UE be advertizing the book now in
Germany.
-
WSLB 119 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 5, 1912
Schenker inquires about the print-run and retail cost of his
Instrumentations-Tabelle, and points out an inconsistency in the edition number. He asks for
clarity on a payment he has just received, stressing his probity.
-
OJ 15/16, [12] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated December 18, 1912
Diatribe by Weisse against Otto Vrieslander's plan to produce a simplified
version of Schenker's Harmonielehre, impugning Vrieslander's motives.
-
OJ 15/16, [20] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated September 13, 1913
Weisse reports a conversation with Franz Steiner about Richard Strauss and his
alleged interest in Schenker's work. — Weisse looks forward to having three lessons a week with
Schenker.
-
OJ 15/15, [K] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, undated [November 1913]
This communication consists of three parts: p. 1 offers an interpretation of a
passage from Brahms's Horn Trio, first movement; p. 2 is a quotation from Schopenhauer
concerning the ethical status of a search for artistic truth; p. 3 offers an interpretation of
the Waltz No. 12 from Brahms's Op. 39.
-
WSLB-Hds 95654 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Seligmann, dated July 24, 1916
Schenker tells Seligmann that he has arranged for copies of his critical
editions of Beethoven’s Op. 110 and Op. 111 to be sent to him. He speaks of the positive
interest his works have received in Germany, and about Hugo Riemann asking him to provide
autobiographical material for an entry in the next edition of his music
lexicon.
-
DLA 69.930/1 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Halm, July 8, 1917
Schenker acknowledges Halm's letter; he discusses the relative merits of editions
of Beethoven variations, and looks forward to seeing Halm's review of his "Beethoven editions";
he is putting the finishing touches to Kontrapunkt 2.
-
OJ 11/35, 9b Handwritten postcard from Halm to Schenker, dated July 21, 1917
Halm thanks Schenker for arranging that Cotta send him NMTP vols. I and
II/1.
-
DLA 69.930/3 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Halm, dated February 7, 1918
Schenker writes scathingly of UE's business practices; describes his
counter-tactics, and his experiences over Niloff, Instrumentations-Tabelle. He will read all of
Halm's writings and asks for a reading-list
-
OJ 9/32, [37] Printed and handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated September 1,
1918
Payment advice note for sales 1917.
-
OJ 10/1, [36] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated March 15, 1919
Dahms is spending time with Otto Vrieslander, working through Schenker's
Harmonielehre with him and preparing himself for study with Schenker. He rejoices at the
crushing of German militarism.
-
OJ 12/62, [2] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated September 1,
1919
[NMTP I and II/1:] Cotta encloses sales report for 1918 and a check for M.
346.92.
-
OJ 15/5, [6] Handwritten letter from Eberhard von Waechter to Schenker, dated October 19,
1919
Waechter understands Schenker's wish not to pre-publish his Art of Performance in
article form, and hopes that Schenker will provide a universal solution to the performance
problem; explains the editorial control of Der Merker, encouraging Weisse to submit his two
articles to it; expresses pleasure that he has procured from Halm reviews of Schenker's
Harmonielehre and Kontrapunkt 1; is unable to send his Musikkritik der Gegenwart at present.
-
OJ 10/3, [5] Handwritten letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated January 8,
1920
Deutsch reports that Hertzka wants the music connoisseur edition of the
"Moonlight" Sonata to include facsimiles only, not textually cleaned editions. Deutsch
outlines the basis of the contract (editors will receive 8% of the retail price) and the
production timetable. He asks if Schenker would rather take on a different facsimile due to
competition from a Copenhagen publisher. Schenker's Theory of Harmony was not it stock in
Vienna.
-
OC 52/239-240 Typed letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated December 18, 1920
Hertzka and Schenker will discuss the Niloff Instrumentations-Tabelle; Hertzka
offers two alternative solutions to UE's taking over of Kontrapunkt 2.
-
OJ 11/36, [5] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker dated March 23, 1922
Hammer praises Schenker's edition of Bach's Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue,
raising an issue about fingering on the clavichord.— He inquires after Tonwille 2, and hopes to
visit Schenker in Vienna soon.
-
OJ 14/4, [2] Handwritten letter from Hans Guttmann to Heinrich Schenker, dated May 14,
1922
Hans Guttmann expresses concern at Heinrich's recent unwellness, admires his
adherence to a strict diet, and speaks of his own better health since coming off a diet;
offers to send provisions to Heinrich and Jeanette; inquires as to the progress of
Heinrich's work; is reading Heinrich's Harmonielehre with some difficulty; and asks Heinrich
to perform a financial transaction for him.
-
OJ 14/45, [17] Handwritten lettercard from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated September 13, 1922
Apparently having returned from a visit to Vienna, Violin expresses his joy at
having seen Schenker recently.
-
OJ 10/1, [77] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated June 15, 1923
Dahms sends best wishes on Schenker's [55th] birthday, thanks him for his
assistance, and praises vol. I of Schenker's Beethoven sonata edition. Members of the German
community in Rome reject his assertions about genius.
-
OJ 11/36, [8] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker dated October 22, 1923
Hammer buys all Schenker's publications, including Tonwille, but admits he has
difficulty understanding Schenker's Harmonielehre; — asks for loan of Halm's [Klavierübung]; —
gives his forthcoming dates;— comments on the lute and its tablature; — considers Busoni's
[Entwurf] wrong-headed.
-
DLA 69.930/12 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Halm, dated April 3‒4, 1924
In response to matters raised by Halm in two previous letters, Schenker discusses
figuration, distinguishing between that which works only on the surface and that which arises
out of the middle and background, drawing on primal intervals. He also concedes that he heard
Bruckner improvising, and criticizes it adversely. He refers to Reger, and outlines plans for
forthcoming volumes of Der Tonwille.
-
OJ 9/12, [1] Handwritten letter from Carl Bamberger to Schenker, dated October 6, 1924
Bamberger writes of his pleasure at working in a theater, and his liking of
Danzig as a medieval city. He is studying Schenker's edition of the Beethoven sonatas, and
has ordered Harmonielehre and Kontrapunkt I and II. He is subscribing to Der Tonwille, and
is interesting one of his colleagues in Schenker's ideas. He inquires after two Schenker
pupils.
-
OJ 6/7, [10] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 26, 1924
Schenker names ten universities that should receive complimentary copies of Der
Tonwille, explaining that university music departments (Seminare) are more suitable recipients
than conservatories and other types of music schools. With 1924 coming to an end, he will resign
from UE and shift publication of Der Tonwille to Piper or Drei-Masken Verlag in Munich. The
latter have agreed to publish his study of Beethoven's Sonata Op. 106
-
OJ 15/16, [55] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, incomplete, written c. August 5,
1925
Weisse apologizes for not having written for a long time. He has seen Furtwängler
and reports that the conductor knows nothing of his writings and has no idea about the Urlinie.
Universal Edition have declined to publish his Sextet. (In the missing portion of the letter,
which is summarized in Schenker's diary, he asks his teacher's help in finding another
publisher, perhaps with Wilhelm Altmann's intervention.)
-
OJ 10/13, [1] Handwritten letter from Dunn to Schenker, dated April 18, 1926
Having [mistakenly] been informed that Der freie Satz is out of print, Dunn
asks Schenker for help in obtaining a copy.
-
OC 52/856 Typed postcard from Ernst Roth (UE) to Reinhard Oppel, dated September 25,
1929
Schenker's Harmonielehre is currently out-of-print, with no reprint
date.
-
OJ 12/50, [4] Handwritten letter from Bernhard Martin to Schenker, dated October 31,
1929
Bernhard Martin sends Schenker graphings of a Mendelssohn Lied ohne Worte and
a J. S. Bach Kleines Präludium. -- He describes the duplicated and missing pages in his
misbound copy of Schenker's Harmonielehre. -- He suggests a correction to Schenker's use of
the term "portamento." -- Having read Otto Vrieslander's biography of C. P. E. Bach, he
proposes to perform a cantata by the latter and describes the concert program in which it
will feature.
-
OJ 6/7, [44] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated November 24, 1929
After reply to some of the more personal points in Violin's previous letter,
Schenker welcomes his friend's efforts to look for a publisher for the Eroica Symphony
monograph, noting that, in spite of the difficulties that Hertzka has caused him, his books
are still in print and his status as a theorist has been acknowledged by the the fact that
the universities of Heidelberg and Leipzig have expressed an interest in appointing him. A
recent article in the Deutsche Tonkünstler-Zeitung will give Violin further ammunition when
approaching a publisher. That same issue also contains an article by Schoenberg touching on
various canonic works (Bach, Prelude in C sharp minor for the Well-Tempered Clavier, Book 1;
Beethoven, Seventh Symphony, finale; Mozart, slow introduction to the "Dissonant" Quartet).
He feels that it is beneath his dignity to make a formal reply; but to illustrate what he
means, and why he is contemptuous of Schoenberg, he provides several voice-leading graphs
and other music examples concerning these works.
-
WSLB 418/1 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), undated [December 19,
1929]
Schenker recommends an essay by Gerhard Albersheim; raises possibility of
unchanged re-issue of Harmonielehre.
-
OC 52/857 Typed letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated December 20, 1929
Hertzka is interested in the Albersheim essay; prospects for a re-edition of
Harmonielehre not good.
-
OJ 6/7, [45] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated December 23, 1929
Schenker, expressing misgivings about the medical profession, nonetheless
hopes that Karl Violin's impending operation is successful. He is still awaiting news about
a publisher for the "Eroica" monograph; Furtwängler's illness has delayed some lines of
enquiry, and Hertzka (at Universal Edition) has not been cooperative.
-
OJ 12/50, [6] Handwritten letter from Bernhard Martin to Schenker, undated [?July c.10,
1930]
Bernhard Martin reports using Schenker's analysis of the Haydn E-flat major
piano sonata [Tonwille 3] with his secondary school class. -- As a violinist he is working
on the Brahms Op. 78 violin sonata. -- He inquires after the "Eroica monograph." --
Universal Edition has still not rectified his defective copy of Schenker's Harmonielehre. --
He asks about Furtwängler's studies with Schenker.
-
WSLB-Hds 191.568 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Deutsch, dated August 23, 1930
Schenker is sending Deutsch copies of letters written by Leo Kestenberg
praising his theories for their practical application to composition and
performance, noting that Furtwängler is championing his cause everywhere. -- He then
launches into a tirade against the city of Vienna for snubbing him and his
work.
-
WSLB 422 Handwritten letter from Schenker to UE, dated October 13, 1930
Schenker inquires as to the likely costs of an unrevised second edition of
Harmonielehre.
-
OC 52/863 Typewritten letter from Ernst Roth (UE) to Schenker, dated November 4,
1930
Roth supplies the costing requested.
-
OJ 9/34, [28] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated October 16, 1931
Cube reports enrollment and quality of students at the Schenker Institute,
Hamburg; his own teaching is increasingly small-group-tuition based, drawing on Tonwille and
Meisterwerk. Karl Violin is recovering.
-
OJ 6/8, [8] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated October 23, 1931
Schenker has written to Ludwig Karpath concerning the matter of Violin’s
appropriation of the title of “Professor” (as discussed in Schenker’s letter of October 17).
He hopes that his friend's difficulties are now entirely behind him.
-
OJ 12/6, [13] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated July 14, 1932
Jonas reports on his visit to Berlin, where he failed to meet with Furtwängler; —
discusses Brahms-Handel Saul and Beethoven Op. 109. — He has heard about the Fünf Urlinie-Tafeln
from Hoboken and Salzer; — discusses plans for publishing his Das Wesen des musikalischen
Kunstwerkes. — Has received books from Alfred Einstein.
-
OC 18/34 Typewritten letter from Arthur Waldeck to Schenker, dated September 22, 1932
Waldeck expresses an interest in translating Schenker' Harmonielehre into
English, and asks to send sample passages.
-
OJ 8/5, [12] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated November 7, 1932
Schenker reports that Joseph Marx wants to adopt a revised version of his
Harmonielehre for the students at the Akademie für Musik und darstellende Kunst in
Vienna.
-
OJ 89/5, [9] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated November 7, 1932
Schenker reports that the [Vienna] Akademie wishes to introduce his Harmonielehre
into its curriculum in an abridged version. — The Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde has granted
consent.
-
NYnscl MP.0008.01/1/1, 2 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Arthur Waldeck, dated November 8,
1932
Schenker stipulates the conditions for granting publication rights for a
translation of his Harmonielehre, and asks which other Schenkerians in the U.S. Waldeck is
acquainted with.
-
OJ 89/5, [10] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Hoboken to Schenker, dated November 11,
1932
Hoboken welcomes the Akademie's acceptance of Schenker's Harmonielehre,
abridged, for teaching purposes; — He has started his cure at the spa.
-
OC 30/18-30 Draft letter from Schenker to Albert Einstein, undated [November 20,
1932]
In this unsent letter, Schenker tells Einstein about his works and the
difficulties he has encountered in promoting them, and calls upon the physicist for help in
gaining financial support for the publication of Free Composition.
-
OC 18/32-33 Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated November 28, 1932
Weisse is uneasy about disparity among translations of Schenker's writings
into English, and suggests that he work with potential translators to arrive at an agreed
set of technical terms. He has renewed contact with Vrieslander, who has sent him a copy of
his recently published songs and Ländler. His work in New York is going well and his family
is thriving, but he sees and hears about a great deal of suffering, on account of the
economic collapse in America.
-
OJ 6/8, [14] Handwritten letter, with envelope, from Schenker to Violin, dated December 19,
1932
In this characteristically long end-of-year letter to his friend, Schenker
mentions his forthcoming edition of Brahms’s study of consecutive octaves and fifths,
Jonas’s book on his achievements as a theorist, Zuckerkandl’s book on opera, and the
possibility of an English translation of his Theory of Harmony.
-
OJ 6/8, [15] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated December 25, 1932
In this letter, much of it written in a bitter and sarcastic tone, Schenker
urges Violin not to appeal to Anthony van Hoboken for financial help. He has sought
assistance for his friend from Ludwig Karpath and Josef Marx.
-
OeNB H Autogr.856/20-1 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Josef Marx, dated December 25, 1932
Schenker has read articles by Marx in a newspaper expressing disatisfaction at
musical life in Vienna; Schenker asks urgently to have a face-to-face meeting with Marx to
discuss these matters and probably others concerning Moriz Violin.
-
OJ 6/8, [16] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated December 29, 1932
Schenker advises Violin to keep up the pressure on Josef Marx regarding a
possible position at the Vienna Akademie; he will do the same. He again discourages his
friend from approaching Anthony van Hoboken with an appeal for financial
assistance.
-
OC 18/29 Typewritten letter from Frederick E. Auslander to Schenker, dated January 5,
1933
Auslander seeks permission from Schenker and his publishers to translate some of
his works.
-
OC 18/19 Typewritten postcard from Marx to Schenker, dated January 15, 1933
Marx changes his visit from January 16 to January 18.
-
OJ 6/8, [20] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated January 19, 1933
Schenker gives Violin an account of a three-hour meeting he had with Joseph
Marx, who expressed his highest regard for Schenker's theories; he expects that his writings
will be adopted by the Vienna Akademie and that Violin will also profit from Marx’s interest
and goodwill.
-
OeNB H Autogr.856/20-3 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Josef Marx, dated January 19, 1933
Schenker urges Marx to advocate on behalf of Moriz Violin as a candidate for a
post at the Akademie für Musik, extolling his qualities as musician and
colleague.
-
OJ 89/6, [1] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated January 20, 1933
Schenker reports (1) discussion with Joseph Marx of a school version of his
Harmonielehre for the Akademie curriculum; (2) proposal from New York for an English
translation of Harmonielehre.
-
Sbb 55 Nachl. 13, [8] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Furtwängler, dated January 24, 1933
Schenker has received a letter from Karpath, and alerts Furtwängler that he will
be hearing from him about the proposed letter to the newspaper; Schenker reports on recent visit
by Joseph Marx re the adaptation of Harmonielehre; Schenker would now be willing to associate
with the Akademie, but appointments there come about only by intrigue.
-
OJ 5/18, 22 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Jonas, dated January 26, 1933
Josef Marx has expressed interest in class-use of the planned school edition
of Schenker's Harmonielehre; Schenker suggests Jonas's Einführung be placed before Marx; a
second proposal for an English translation of Harmonielehre has come in.
-
OJ 8/5, [15] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated February 15, 1933
Schenker reports reading a newspaper article in which Arnold Schoenberg was
not offered a post at the Vienna Academy, and draws from it a parallel with Violin and
himself.
-
OJ 89/6, [2] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Hoboken to Schenker, dated February 15,
1933
Miss Boy has had an angina attack — they are to be married; — The number of
subscriptions for Jonas's book is disappointing; — Hoboken is weighing up his financial
support for it with that for Schenker's Freier Satz.
-
OJ 89/6, [3] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated February 17, 1933
Congratulating Hoboken on his forthcoming marriage to Frl. Boy, Schenker
reports that Kalmus is playing a devious financial game over Oktaven u. Quinten (which is in
press) and Der freie Satz (which he thinks will take two years to publish) that may yet see
the latter revert to Cotta. — He speaks of Marx's naiveté over the proposed school version
of Harmonielehre. — He reports on the remaining stocks of Das Meisterwerk in der
Musik.
-
OJ 15/16, [90] Handwritten letter from Hans Weisse to Schenker, dated March 17, 1933
Weisse reports the success of his lecture on the C minor prelude from the
Well-Tempered Clavier, Book 1. — He is currently giving two lectures on a Haydn's sonata. —
He inquires about the possibility of having Schenker's foreground graphs for the "Eroica"
Symphony printed separately and sold to his pupils, for a series of lectures planned for the
following year; the profits entirely to Schenker. — He sees little prospect visiting Europe
in the summer, as his financial situation has worsened: the Mannes School has been forced to
reduce his teaching for the next season. — He expresses his doubts about Vrieslander's
ability to reshape Schenker's Harmonielehre as a school textbook, and about the value of
Harmonielehre itself in the light of his teacher's most advanced theoretical
ideas.
-
OJ 12/6, [20] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated March 20, 1933
Van Hoboken is willing to advance 600 Mk for the Einführung; Jonas inquires,
in that regard, after the plan to reprint Schenker's Harmonielehre, indicating that he had
previously prepared a reformulation of that work for teaching purposes; — he alludes to
introductory lectures to Furtwängler concerts, and the Handel-Brahms Saul
project.
-
OJ 5/18, 24 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated March 22, 1933
Schenker recounts Joseph Marx's requirements for adapting his Harmonielehre
for teaching purposes, and the involvement of Alfred Kalmus at UE. — Refers to Vrieslander's
adaptation of Kontrapunkt and Jonas's of Harmonielehre. — Reports Hans Weisse's success;
alludes to the Handel-Schenker Saul project.
-
OC 18/30 Typewritten letter from Frederick E. Auslander to Schenker, dated April 8,
1933
Auslander and Weisse plan to wait for clarity over the Marx Harmonielehre plan. —
Meanwhile, Auslander will publish extracts from Schenker's works in a magazine, with a view to
complete translations later.
-
OJ 9/34, [38] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated September 7, 1933
Cube reports on his poor health and straitened cirumstances, teaching at two
conservatories and private pupils; he eagerly awaits Der freie Satz, and reports on his
investigation of diatonic systems.
-
OJ 12/6, [26] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated December 10, 1933
Jonas asks how the music examples in Das Meisterwerk were printed, with
respect to his Das Wesen des musikalischen Kunstwerks. — In Riemann's Musiklexikon, ed. A.
Einstein, Einstein's reference to Schenker appears under "Bach."
-
OJ 5/18, 34 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Jonas, dated January 9, 1934
Der freie Satz "proper" is finished, but will add chapters on meter and form.
Van Hoboken is making further difficulties for Jonas.
-
OJ 15/16, [94] Handwritten letter from Hans Weisse to Schenker, dated March 15, 1934
Weisse apologizes for long silence, largely on account of depression at the
lack of enrollment at Mannes and of enthusiasm for his recently published Violin Sonata. —
At Mannes he lectures about his own work, because it is important to show how Schenkerian
theory can have a practical application for composers; his pupil Israel Citkowitz is the
only cause for optimism. — At Columbia University, where he "smuggles" Schenkerian theory
into his lectures, enrolment continues to be large. — He sends a copy of his Violin Sonata,
and promises his Variations on a Popular American Song. — He is not coming to Europe this
summer. — Universal Edition is going ahead with a schools' version of Schenker's
Harmonielehre, but he is surprised that Alfred Kalmus expects him to be involved in an
American edition of this.
-
OJ 12/6, [30] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated March 16, 1934
Jonas has mailed off the book [to his publisher]; he hopes that Schenker will
approve of it [when eventually he sees it]. It comprises four chapters and two appendices. —
He thanks Schenker for the gift of his Syrian Dances. — The Director of the Hochschule für
Musik in Berlin, Fritz Stein, has written that he cannot arrange a position for Jonas,
whereas Jonas (with support from Furtwängler) had sought only students to whom to give
[private] lessons. — Jonas alludes to difficult conditions under which he is working, and
describes his conflict with piano teacher Georg Bertram. — Relations with van Hoboken are
strained, despite Jonas's having included an appendix about the Photogrammarchiv in his
book.
-
FS 40/1, [21] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Salzer, dated March 25, 1934
Schenker cancels the seminar for March 30, and sends Easter greetings. — Is keen
to read the manuscript of Salzer's book. — Reports letter from Weisse regarding an English
translation of Harmonielehre.
-
OC 18/36 Typewritten letter from Arthur Waldeck to Schenker, dated June 3, 1934
After the failure of his initiative to fund a translation of Harmonielehre,
Waldeck tells Schenker of his plan to coauthor with Nathan Broder an article introducing
Schenker's theory [to English-speaking readers].
-
OJ 89/7, [10] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated July 12, 1934
8-page letter: Schenker thanks Hoboken for his support for Jonas's new book. — He
reminds Hoboken of his earlier promise to support Der freie Satz financially, and predicts that
costs will be high. — Otto Erich Deutsch has been granted a course at the Vienna Academy for
Music and Performing Arts.
-
OJ 5/34, [2] Handwritten revised draft letter from Schenker to Alphons Rothschild, in Jeanette
Schenker's hand, undated [August 3‒6, 1934]
Draft accompanying letter for a copy of Oswald Jonas's Das Wesen ... —
Schenker reiterates his gratitude for previous financial support, and reports that he now
has 11 published works, many articles, and entries on him in several general encyclopedias.
— Only in Vienna is he unrecognized. — He describes Wilhelm Furtwängler's faith in his
theories and the support he has given him. — He mentions his earlier proposal for a
Rothschild orchestra.
-
OC 44/23 Handwritten letter from Marianne Kahn to Schenker, dated September 29,
1934
Miss Kahn commits to her 1934/35 lesson schedule with Schenker. She reports on
her own pupil cohort.
-
OJ 12/6, [40] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated December 19, 1934
Jonas encloses a translation of an English review of his book; comments
despairingly. — Lawsuit against Willi Reich comes to court on December 22. — Jonas hopes to
give lectures in Vienna. —Asks if Schenker knows Carl Johann Perl. —Holiday good
wishes.
-
OJ 15/22, [10] Handwritten letter and envelope from Willfort to Jeanette Schenker, dated July 5,
1935
Willfort lays out his plans for an abbreviated edition of Schenker's
Harmonielehre, and explains his negotiations with Alfred Kalmus of UE.
-
OJ 15/22, [11] Handwritten letter and envelope from Willfort to Jeanette Schenker, dated July 18,
1935
Willfort explains his involvement in plans for a re-edition of the Harmonielehre,
and thanks Jeanette for two photographs.
-
OJ 10/18, [13] Handwritten letter from Elias to Jeanette Schenker dated August 1, 1935
Jeanette Schenker, currently in Hofgastein, has decided where to live in the
future; that involves leaving Keilgasse. — Elias supports Jeanette in her view of a new
edition of Harmonielehre. — Elias is surprised to hear the plan for a Schenker Institute in
Vienna. — She regrets that Schenker's aphorisms will not be published by Ungar. — She has
been unable to meet with Moriz Violin regarding the "Appassionata" Sonata. — She is reading
Der freie Satz.
-
OJ 15/16, [100] Handwritten letter from Hans Weisse to Jeanette Schenker, dated September 18,
1935
Weisse thanks Jeanette for sending a photograph of her late husband’s
death-mask, and other photographs. — He offers her advice about what to do with Heinrich's
library of books, and with his sketches and other unpublished analyses. The bulk of the
letter is a critique of Der freie Satz, about which he has serious misgivings, partly
concerning the title and subtitle, partly concerning its status as a textbook
(Lehrbuch).
-
OJ 15/16, [101] Handwritten letter from Hans Weisse to Jeanette Schenker, dated October 22,
1935
Weisse thanks Jeanette for the photographs of her husband, and will distribute
them to his pupils soon, when he sends the next payment of financial support that he has
collected from them on her behalf. — He is actively engaged in bringing Schenker's ideas to
an English-speaking audience, and urges her to consider agreeing to a suitably shortened
version of Harmonielehre, rather than a word-for-word translation. — For Der freie Satz, an
English translation would do more harm to Schenker's cause than not to have it translated at
all, and it would be necessary to reconceive the presentation of the theory entirely,
especially with respect to terminology. — He suggests that there may be a market for
Schenker's library in American universities and libraries.
-
OJ 14/8, [15] Typewritten and handwritten letter with envelope from Paul & Anna Schiff to
Jeanette Schenker, postmarked February 1, 1938
Paul and Anna Schiff have moved from Karlsbad back to Prague. They marvel at
Jeanette’s work on her late husband’s papers and on a new edition of one of his books. —
They give news about the family and ask her to write before her next
travels.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [34] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, undated [October 1?,
1949]
Violin reports on a successful performance of a C. P. E. Bach concerto at the
Carmel Bach Festival and on a Music Teacher's Convention in San Francisco.